Yet another attempt by the right to explain Mitt Romney’s stunning (to them) loss in last November’s Presidential Election. Towleroad.com reports:
I don’t think it’s very controversial to suggest that a candidate who favors gay marriage and free contraception might have more appeal to a younger demographic. Does anyone want to argue that free contraception is seen as a more pressing issue to your average 21-year-old than to a 55-year-old voter, or that there are more gay rights organizations on college campuses than in VFW halls?
It had nothing to do with running a poor, entitled, out of touch candidate, right?