ban

...now browsing by category

 

Poll Analyst Nate Silver Thinks Gay Marriage Ban Likely to Fail in Maine

Monday, October 5th, 2009

Back in April, I conducted an analysis of the prospects of a gay marriage ban becoming law in each of the 50 states. The analysis found that support for gay marriage bans was strongly tied to two factors: the degree of religiosity in a state, as measured by 2008 Gallup tracking surveys, and the year that the initiative was up for vote — marriage bans have lost support at a rate of about 2 percent per year, ceteris paribus. That analysis concluded that a Maine is one of 11 states that would probably vote to reject a ban on gay marriage if a referendum were held this year.

Mainers, in fact, will soon have a chance to test this proposition. In November, they will go to the polls to vote on Question 1; a yes vote would overturn a law passed earlier this year by the state’s legislature that permits gays and lesbians to get married in the state.

I decided to re-visit my model, which consists of a relatively simple data set of all previous anti-gay marriage initiatives. 31 of 32 such initiatives have passed, the sole exception being Arizona Proposition 107, which failed in 2006, although Arizona’s voters decided two years later to approve a similar measure that limited its scope to marriage rather than civil unions. I’ve expanded the model to include a new variable, which — pursuant to the Arizona case — is whether the initiative sought to ban civil unions in addition to marriage. (Although I’d given this a cursory look before, I evidently wasn’t careful enough, because it turns out to be highly statistically significant).

Full Story from FiveThirtyEight.com: http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/10/analysis-gay-marriage-ban-is-underdog.html

Planning to marry your partner? Click here for gay marriage resources in Maine.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Republican Lawmaker in NH Proposes Anti Gay Marriage Constitutional Amendment

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

A Fremont lawmaker wants to amend New Hampshire’s constitution to protect parental rights and traditional marriage.

Republican Rep. Dan Itse is affiliated with Citizens Leadership of New Hampshire, which was created a few years ago to highlight threats to constitutional freedoms. He said Wednesday he will sponsor two constitutional amendments when the Legislature reconvenes in January. One would make only marriages between men and women recognized by the state. The other would prohibit the state from abridging a parent’s right to control their child’s health, education and welfare.

Similar efforts have failed in the past. If approved by the Legislature, the amendments would go before voters in November 2010, 11 months after gay marriage becomes legal.

Full Story from WBZ TV: http://wbztv.com/wireapnewsnh/NH.lawmaker.proposes.2.1218312.html

Planning to marry your partner? Click here for gay marriage resources in New Hampshire.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com with “subscribe blog” as the subject. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Four Reasons Not to Ban Gay Marriage

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

This year, the California Supreme Court will decide whether or not to overturn Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s 2005 veto of a bill legalizing same-sex marriages. This should be a fairly easy day on the bench. The following are a collection of the most common arguments against gay marriage and some opinions as to why they are simply insufficient.

1. ‘The country, as a whole, has a right to determine what it will and won’t accept.’

This is a valid point. America is a democracy and we vote to express our opinions so we can be accurately represented. However, there are certain things the majority has the right to determine and then there are those it doesn’t. Our government has built-in checks against simple majority rule, because it’s incredibly dangerous. The majority of our country was, at various points in our history, in favor of slavery, segregation and President George W. Bush. Today we recognize those stances as regrettable and foolish. Might we be saying the same of this debate in 50 years?

Full Story from the New University: http://www.newuniversity.org/2007/01/opinion/no_reason_to_ban21/

Planning to marry your partner? Click here for gay marriage resources.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com with “subscribe blog” as the subject. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.