civil partnerships

...now browsing by category

 

The Birth of Gay Wediquette

Sunday, February 19th, 2012

Hello there!

There is no Emily Post etiquette guide for gay weddings.

I’ve been a very busy Caribbean destination wedding planner on a little island seven miles off the coast of Puerto Rico for five years, but I’d never really thought about that challenge before my client Patrick brought it to my attention as we were putting the finishing touches on his April commitment ceremony.  He’s absolutely right.  How have I missed that?  His is certainly not the first gay wedding I’ve ever planned.  I plan lots of commitment ceremonies because Vieques Island is very, very gay friendly and has a number of gay-owned businesses and accommodations.

Because there is no real etiquette authority (or rules) about how you do destination weddings (or gay destination weddings), I’ve been making it up as I go along.  No really, I have.  You see, I was raised by an etiquette aficionado.  My cousin and I jokingly refer to my mom and her dad as “Ms.” and “Mr. Post,” respectively.  They’re the only people left in the world that I know who flip over wedding invitations and run their fingers over the back to check and see if it’s real engraving before they ever look to see who is inviting them!  Not saying there’s anything wrong with that.  Just sayin’.

I was raised in a strict household with consistent manners enforcement.  We called our parents “Ma’am” and “Sir.”  Some people seem to find that appalling now, but I think it was a benefit.  We all have lovely manners as a result.  And I’m a lucky wedding planner who was brought up to know which fork is which, where to seat whom for special events (even when there are multiple spouses involved), how to properly address an envelope to anyone (The Honorable, The Reverend, etc.), how to properly set a table, how to write an amazing thank you note, and how to keep a polite smile on my face no matter how horrified I am by what I’m seeing in front of me.  I spent 13 years in a plaid kilt and I was a Girl Scout with all the manners badges.  See – now I’ve established my credentials and they’re probably better than most.  So let’s proceed.

How have I been determining destination wediquette for the past five years?  I’ve been winging it with a little common sense.  This is a fun topic that I’ll probably blog about more than one time (hello, I see a book here!), but for today, let’s start at the beginning and tackle the etiquette questions that come up most frequently with my gay clients.

 1 – How do you address the wedding invitations? 

Believe it or not, that’s just as tricky a question no matter what kind of couple is getting married.  Times have changed.  If you want to involve your parents in the wording of the wedding invitations, you can refer to the old fashioned method of naming the people who are hosting the event.  In this day and age, most couples are contributing significantly to their own wedding budgets so not everybody puts their parents’ names on the wedding invitations anymore.  In fact, having mom and dad on there at all is less and less common.  But if you are using their names, and if you want to do it the proper or traditional way, and if one set of parents are paying for a significant portion of the wedding, that set of parents should have top billing on the invitation.  For example, if Bob’s parents are paying for the entire wedding, the invite would read (allowing for your own phraseology and style):

Mr. and Mrs. Robert Graham Smith cordially invite you

to the marriage of their son

Robert Graham Smith, Junior,

to Edward Thomas Black

If both sets of parents are paying or you want to acknowledge them equally regardless of financial contribution (more popular in this day and age than you can even imagine), you would add the line after the second groom’s name “son of Dr. and Mrs. Leroy Desmond Black.”  Yes, I am making the names up (I knew you were wondering).

2 – Who sits on which side at the wedding? 

Traditionally, the bride’s family goes on the left and the groom’s family sits on the right.  But at a gay wedding where there are two brides or two grooms, it’s less clear.  Joke all you like, but one half of each couple has always planned more of the wedding.  That’s the person we put on the bride’s side if there’s a question about it.  It’s certainly not a hard and fast rule, and you can do whatever you want, but if you need to ask me… I’ll tell you which one of you is the bride. J

3 – How do you seat the parents?  Who gets treated like top dog? 

Usually it’s the bride’s mother, but when you have two MoGs instead of a MoB, what’s the protocol?  Well, if you decided to follow my first suggestion of putting whoever planned the wedding on the left side, you would seat the mother of the person on the right first, and then follow with the MoG who will be seated on the left (the traditional MoB spot).

4 – Should you do the first dance and cut the cake?

You should do whatever you want to do on your wedding day.  If you’ve always wanted to smash your partner’s face with cake, why hold back?  Yet, you don’t have to do anything you’re uncomfortable with.  I have plenty of straight clients who opt out of cake cuttings, first dances and even the bouquet toss.  You should do things that make your day more special.

5 – Who belongs on the “must invite” list?

The same people should be invited to your wedding regardless of your sexual preference.  The only people you should invite should be people who love you and support your decision to get married.  If you have some family members who don’t approve of your decision, you don’t have to invite them.  Nobody negative should be included.  Don’t try to be the bigger or better person.  It’s your wedding day.  The entire day is about the union you’ve chosen to form.  Anybody who doesn’t get that and isn’t completely behind you doesn’t belong there on such an important day.

Etiquette is more than knowing that nobody’s plate should be cleared from the table until everybody at that table is finished eating.  A lot of it is a framework to which you apply common sense.  It gets tricky, however, when the social situation under consideration is a wedding or commitment ceremony because there are such a heightened level of emotions involved.  Sometimes you have to stop, take a breath, and mentally step back from a situation to make the proper wediquette decision.  Ask yourself what would EP (Emily Post) do?

Until next time, happy wedding planning from Weddings in Vieques and Weddings in Culebra?   Have you started planning your Caribbean destination wedding or commitment ceremony yet?

Sandy

www.weddingsinvieques.com

Sandy Malone, a guest blogger with Purple Unions, is the owner of Weddings in Vieques, a full-service destination wedding planning company based on Vieques Island, seven miles off the coast of Puerto Rico.  She and her team (including her husband Bill, a retired SWAT team commander) have planned and executed almost 400 weddings and commitment ceremonies in the Spanish Virgin Islands.  Sandy is a veteran event planner from Washington, DC, with years of experience planning large and small weddings, press conference, and corporate and political events.  She has planned countless events on Vieques Island, beginning with her own wedding back in 2004.  Since that time, her professional staff has executed large and small weddings of all styles, including elopements, vow renewals and fabulously posh events at multi-million dollar waterfront villas.  She has also planned family reunions, destination baby showers, corporate retreats and a variety of other events for clients from all over the United States and Canada.  Sandy is also the owner of Weddings in Culebra (wedding planning on Vieques’ little sister island) and Flowers in Vieques (a full service floral and décor firm).  Visit her at www.weddingsinvieques.com.

UK: House of Lords Votes 95-21 to Allow Gay Weddings in Welcoming Churches

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

When the Church of England’s bishops defeated a clarification of the Equality Bill’s clause on religious exemption last month it was possible to construct a principled defence of their position. But the campaign to block the celebration of civil partnerships from other denominations’ buildings was wholly indefensible. Last night it failed by a spectacular margin in the House of Lords – 95 to 21; although the bishops’ votes were evenly split: of the serving ones, Bradford voted to block, and Newcastle to permit; of the retired bishops, Lord Harries voted for permission, and Lord Eames, the former Archbishop of Armagh, voted against.

The case in favour as put by Lady Butler-Sloss, who had earlier that evening been accused of putting down homophobic amendments that would have protected Catholic adoption agencies against the law, an accusation she angrily disputed. In this context, she said:

“Same-sex couples can have strong and devoted relationships equal to, but different from, marriage and they may wish to have those relationships sanctified by a religious ceremony. If there are churches and synagogues prepared to do that, why should we stand in their way? They have rights to be loved and rights to have their ceremonies recognised.”

Full Story from The Guardian
Click here for gay marriage resources.
To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Costa Rica: Update on Proposed Gay Unions Bill

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

In Costa Rica, the issue of same-sex relationships has been an active topic for the past several years, but little progress has been made in terms of establishing an official policy. In a country with Roman Catholicism as the official Constitutional religion and with a large majority conservative population, it has been a controversial topic with supporters and opponents on both sides of the issue.

After several attempts to bring the issue to the legislative level, the most recent proposal called Coexistence Societies, which can be read here in Spanish, does not seek to legalize same-sex marriage, but seeks to offer alternatives for these couples. The text is based on four basic points [es], which include hospital visitation rights, dividing of earned wealth, inheritance rights, and insurance options.

During the presidential campaign, Laura Chinchilla of the National Liberation Party (PLN), who was elected on February 7, 2010 promised to support same-sex unions as an alternative to marriage, as she expressed in this video [es]. However, shortly after she was elected and after meetings with Assembly deputies from the Christian-aligned parties and with Evangelical Christian leaders, she hardened her position towards the proposal of same-sex unions [es].

Full Story from Global Voices
Click here for gay marriage resources.
To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

UK: Update on Gay Rights Legislation

Friday, February 5th, 2010

THE LAW covering church employment will stay as it is, the Minister for Women and Equality, Harriet Harman, said on Tuesday. She was speaking after the defeat in the Lords of an amendment to the Equality Bill (News, 29 January), which sought to clarify the exemption for religious bodies from the existing legislation, to ensure that it applied only to church ministers.

In a statement, Ms Harman said: “Employment and non-discrimination law applies to religious organisations when they employ people in non-religious jobs in the same way that it does to all other employers. We have never insisted on non-discrimination legislation applying to religious jobs such as being a vicar, a bishop, an imam, or a rabbi.”

She continued: “We thought that it would be helpful for everyone involved to clarify the law, and that is what the amendment that we brought forward aimed to do. That amend ment was rejected. So the law remains as it was.”

Full Story from the Church Times
Click here for gay marriage resources in England.
To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

France: British Civil Partnerships to be Recognized Under French Law

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Graham Watson, the Lib Dem MEP who represents the UK’s South West and Gibraltar Euro-constituency, is celebrating a hard-won victory in the battle to secure equal rights for UK same-sex couples living in France.

Since August 2007, French couples in a Pacte Civil de Solidarité (PAC) have enjoyed the same rights in relation to tax and inheritance laws which had previously only applied to married couples. A year ago, the French National Assembly approved a measure to have foreign legal same-sex marriages/unions/partnerships recognised in France as PACs.

However, due to a legal anomaly, British civil partnerships were not recognised under French law, meaning that same-sex couples, who had registered a civil partnership in the UK, living in France were liable for a 60% inheritance tax and were treated like any other unmarried couple.

Full Story from UK Gay News
Click here for gay marriage resources in France.
To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

UK: Straight Couple to Sue to Open Marriage to Gays, Civil Partnerships to Straights

Monday, February 1st, 2010

A simultaneous legal challenge to the ban on same-sex marriage and opposite-sex civil partnerships is being prepared by gay human rights group OutRage!, this week.

It comes after heterosexual couple Tom Freeman and Katherine Doyle filed an application for a civil partnership at Islington registry office last November. They were rejected because, under UK law, civil partnerships are open to only same-sex couples. This legal exclusion mirrors the way civil marriage is available solely to heterosexual partners. They say the decision is “discriminatory and perpetuates legal inequality.”

Now, Outrage! has the support of legal expert, Professor Robert Wintemute, Professor of Human Rights Law at Kings College in London, who has agreed to take on the case.

Full Story from the Pink Paper
Click here for gay marriage resources in England.
To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Ireland: Official Says Public Places Must be Open to Gay Couples for Civil Partnerships

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

MINISTER OF State for the Office of Public Works Martin Mansergh warned that public facilities should not be closed to gay couples seeking to obtain a civil partnership. Some proposals, he said, had been made for what would, in effect, amount to discrimination, namely, that offices of the State should be allowed to withhold, or not participate in, civil partnership ceremonies.

“My view is that if one takes up a public appointment, one must carry out the duties that the law prescribes, and those duties will change from time to time as the law changes,’’ said Dr Mansergh.

“We should not give sanction, effectively, to homophobia for conscientious reasons.’’ Dr Mansergh was speaking during the resumed Second Stage debate on the Civil Partnership Bill 2009.

Full Story from the Irish Times

Click here for gay marriage resources.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

UK: Conservative Leader Promises Equality For Gay/Lesbian Couples in Tax System

Monday, January 11th, 2010

Conservative leader David Cameron promised on Monday to offer tax breaks to same-sex couples engaging in civil partnerships, one of a raft of family-friendly measures he hopes will soften his party’s image.

Cameron, who will become prime minister if the Conservatives win a general election due by June, was seeking to bounce back after admitting last week he had “messed up” by appearing to go back on a pledge to give married couples tax breaks.

“We will recognise marriage, whether between a man and a woman, a woman and a woman or a man and a man, in the tax system — and yes, that is a commitment,” he said during a speech at think-tank Demos.

Full Story from Reuters: http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE60A2QG20100111

Click here for gay marriage resources in England.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Caribbean: Bonaire, St. Eustatius & Saba Islands to Recognize Gay Marriage

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Married and registered gay couples will obtain legal protection against discrimination by government agencies in the BES islands Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba after the islands have obtained their new status as public entities in the Dutch Kingdom.

Articles will be included in the Civil Code for the BES islands stipulating that marriages or registered partnerships contracted in Holland will have the legal rights afforded them by Dutch Civil Law, State Secretary for Internal Affairs and Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld-Schouten said in a letter to the Dutch Parliament’s Second Chamber in answer to Labour PvdA party questions.

“Following Article 40 of the Statute, it is determined in Article 5 of the draft BES Public Entities Implementation Law that authenticated copies of contracts can be implemented anywhere in the Kingdom of Netherlands,” she stated. “This means that a marriage between persons of the same gender and a registered partnership should also be registered at the civil registries or census offices of the BES islands.”

Full Story from The Daily Herald: http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/m189/gaym189.html

Click here for gay marriage resources.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

UK: Civil Partnerships, Four Years Later

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

Four years ago this week, Grainne Close and Shannon Sickles became the first same-sex couple in Great Britain to form a civil partnership, on December 19th 2005. Their union was made possible by the 2004 Civil Partnership Act, implemented to give gay couples the same rights and legal recognition as their straight, married counterparts. But, says human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell, “Civil partnerships are not equality.”

So, four years on, is civil partnership working out?

It was undoubtedly a step in the right direction for gay couples. Not only do civil partnerships grant homosexual couples legal rights, but, more widely, they celebrate gay relationships and validate them in the eyes of society. However, even after four years, there are still plenty of legislative inequalities to iron out.

Full Story from Se7en Magazine: http://se7enmagazine.com/the-issue/39-europe/813-can-we-make-civil-partnership-work-.html

Click here for gay marriage resources in England.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.