civil union

...now browsing by category

 

Colorado Republican’s Gay Son Disappointed Dad Killed Civil Unions Bill

Wednesday, May 16th, 2012

When Montrose Republican Don Coram cast a deciding vote Monday night to kill Colorado’s civil unions bill, he “let down” a gay community that includes his only child, his son told The Denver Post.

Dee Coram the openly gay son of Republican representative from the 58th district Don Coram, in Colorado, pitched his father for a yes vote, but to no avail.  “Yesterday was the first and only time I ever called him and said, “Can you do this?” said 44-year-old Dee Coram. “He said, ‘I love you, but absolutely not.’ ”

The Denver Post reports that “Civil unions for same-sex couples seemed destined for success toward the end of the Colorado legislative session, which closed last week. It had cleared three Republican-controlled House committees and appeared to have a majority of votes on the House floor.”

But House Speaker Frank McNulty, R-Highlands Ranch, refused to let lawmakers cast their votes. Gov. John Hickenlooper countered by calling a special session. The reincarnated civil unions bill on Monday landed in McNulty’s so-called “kill committee,” where he expected the bill to die.

According to the Denver Post piece : “One by one the votes came down. In the end, Don Coram — noting how proud he was of his gay son — lined up with his fellow Republican party members. The hard-fought legislation died 5-4.

Dee Coram expressed disappointment and said the two haven’t spoken since Monday.

“I was told by my grandfather, there’s always a time to lead and there’s always a time to follow,” Dee Coram said. “He was given a time to lead, and he didn’t do it. He could have and should have been the deciding vote.”

This is not even same-sex marriage we are talking about here – the denial of the purported alternative to marriage,  Civil Unions, designed to impart basic partnership rights to same-sex couples,  is a certain kick below the belt by father to son.
Read more: Gay son “let down” by father’s vote against Colorado civil unions bill – The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_20629843/gay-son-let-down-by-fathers-vote-against#ixzz1v3HWO5nz

 

President Obama Voices his Support for Marriage Equality

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012

Amidst speculation of his evolution on the issue of marriage equality, President Obama, today spoke of its finality.

By Melanie Nathan, May 09, 20112.

Speaking Wednesday with ABC News’ Robin Roberts, President Barack Obama spoke about his evolution toward full marriage equality for same-sex American couples.

He said that he and his administration have long “stood on the side of broader equality for the LGBT community,” pointing to the repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy and the decision to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act in court, among others.

President Obama’s evolution is explained from these quotes which appeared within hours of the interview in the Los Angeles Times Article:-

“I had hesitated on gay marriage in part because I thought that civil unions would be sufficient,” he said. “And I was sensitive to the fact that for a lot of people, the word ‘marriage’ was something that evokes very powerful traditions, religious beliefs, and so forth.”

That changed, Obama said, as he reflected more on the relationships of friends and staff and the feelings of gay members of the military who “feel constrained.”  “At a certain point, I’ve just concluded that for me personally, it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married,” he concluded. In the interview, Obama also reflected on the rapid change in public opinion on the issue, particularly among younger generations.

“When I go to college campuses, sometimes I talk to college Republicans who think that I have terrible policies on the economy, on foreign policy, but are very clear that when it comes to same-sex equality or, you know, sexual orientation that they believe in equality,” he said.

Obama noted that his daughters have friends who have same-sex parents. “There have been times where Michelle and I have been sitting around the dinner table, and we’re talking about their friends and their parents, and Malia and Sasha, it wouldn’t dawn on them that somehow their friends’ parents would be treated differently. It doesn’t make sense to them and, frankly, that’s the kind of thing that prompts a change in perspective,” he said.

LGBT activists are commenting with pride and admiration for the President:

John Lewis, MEUSA Legal Director, said, “I am thrilled that the dream of marriage equality is now so much closer, thanks to the President’s decisive leadership. Marriage is about love and commitment, and the President looked at this decision with his heart — not as a political calculation — and decided to stand on the side of love. In standing on the side of love, he also decided to stand on the right side of history.”

Robin Tyler, national activist and the original lesbian plaintiff to sue in the successful case (Tyler v State of California) that brought marriage equality for same sex couples to California, celebrates President Obama’s decision to come out for marriage equality today.

 ”There is absolutely no question of who I will support in the coming Presidential elections. Mitt Romney donated through his Mormon Church, $10,000 to Yes of Proposition 8. Donations to discrimination are not ‘charitable.’ Mitt Romeny violated our civil rights. We need a President who supports all American’s and their families, including LGBT ones. Today, President Obama showed that he has the courage to come out publicly and support marriage for lesbian and gay couples. There is actually no such thing as ‘gay’ marriage. There is no ‘gay driver’s license’ or ‘gay birth certificate.’ It is just marriage for same-sex adult couples. Our President has finally evolved!

There was never a doubt in my mind that the President had evolved on the issue of same-sex marriage; since recently the President had said he would sign the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act , the legislation that bans same-sex couples who are legally married from participating in Federal civil law granted by marriage to heterosexual couples.  Now that the President has made it clear to all who could not read into this as indicative of his evolution, it could not be more clear that he actually does support gay marriage.

So well done to President Obama, the skeptics in the LGBTQI community can now focus on the re-election of a President who has actually already done more than any other to forward the interests of equality.

Politically, let us hope that those in the community who insisted Obama be overt in his stance now support him one hundred percent unconditionally in his bid for re-election, because you can be rest assured that FOX News, Santorum, Romney and Maggie Gallagher, to name but a few, will do everything in their power to make this the re-invigoration of the wedge issue many assumed may have dwindled.

  GAY U.S.A. the Movie

Melanie Nathan
nathan@privatecourts.com

Colorado State House Committee Approves Civil Unions Bill

Friday, May 4th, 2012

A Republican controlled House Judiciary Committee has approved a bill to establish civil unions in Colorado. The bill, sponsored by gay Denver Democrats Sen. Pat Steadman and Rep. Mark Ferrandino, passed 6-5 with support from Republican Rep. B.J. Nikkel of Loveland.

Nikkel, the House Whip, voted against the bill last year. “It was simply the right thing to do,” Nikkel said after the vote.

The bill is expected to clear all other committees, and become law if it reaches the full House floor by time the Colorado General Assembly is set to adjourn May 9. Scheduling the bill for a vote is up to House Leadership, Republicans who have voiced opposition to the bill.

At least three additional House Republicans have gone on record saying they’ll vote for the bill if it reaches the full floor: Reps. Kevin Priola, Robert Ramirez, and Laura Bradford.

Ferrandino said there is plenty of time to get the bill to Gov. John Hickenlooper who has vowed to sign the bill.

READ MORE at LGBTQ Nation

The Birth of Gay Wediquette

Sunday, February 19th, 2012

Hello there!

There is no Emily Post etiquette guide for gay weddings.

I’ve been a very busy Caribbean destination wedding planner on a little island seven miles off the coast of Puerto Rico for five years, but I’d never really thought about that challenge before my client Patrick brought it to my attention as we were putting the finishing touches on his April commitment ceremony.  He’s absolutely right.  How have I missed that?  His is certainly not the first gay wedding I’ve ever planned.  I plan lots of commitment ceremonies because Vieques Island is very, very gay friendly and has a number of gay-owned businesses and accommodations.

Because there is no real etiquette authority (or rules) about how you do destination weddings (or gay destination weddings), I’ve been making it up as I go along.  No really, I have.  You see, I was raised by an etiquette aficionado.  My cousin and I jokingly refer to my mom and her dad as “Ms.” and “Mr. Post,” respectively.  They’re the only people left in the world that I know who flip over wedding invitations and run their fingers over the back to check and see if it’s real engraving before they ever look to see who is inviting them!  Not saying there’s anything wrong with that.  Just sayin’.

I was raised in a strict household with consistent manners enforcement.  We called our parents “Ma’am” and “Sir.”  Some people seem to find that appalling now, but I think it was a benefit.  We all have lovely manners as a result.  And I’m a lucky wedding planner who was brought up to know which fork is which, where to seat whom for special events (even when there are multiple spouses involved), how to properly address an envelope to anyone (The Honorable, The Reverend, etc.), how to properly set a table, how to write an amazing thank you note, and how to keep a polite smile on my face no matter how horrified I am by what I’m seeing in front of me.  I spent 13 years in a plaid kilt and I was a Girl Scout with all the manners badges.  See – now I’ve established my credentials and they’re probably better than most.  So let’s proceed.

How have I been determining destination wediquette for the past five years?  I’ve been winging it with a little common sense.  This is a fun topic that I’ll probably blog about more than one time (hello, I see a book here!), but for today, let’s start at the beginning and tackle the etiquette questions that come up most frequently with my gay clients.

 1 – How do you address the wedding invitations? 

Believe it or not, that’s just as tricky a question no matter what kind of couple is getting married.  Times have changed.  If you want to involve your parents in the wording of the wedding invitations, you can refer to the old fashioned method of naming the people who are hosting the event.  In this day and age, most couples are contributing significantly to their own wedding budgets so not everybody puts their parents’ names on the wedding invitations anymore.  In fact, having mom and dad on there at all is less and less common.  But if you are using their names, and if you want to do it the proper or traditional way, and if one set of parents are paying for a significant portion of the wedding, that set of parents should have top billing on the invitation.  For example, if Bob’s parents are paying for the entire wedding, the invite would read (allowing for your own phraseology and style):

Mr. and Mrs. Robert Graham Smith cordially invite you

to the marriage of their son

Robert Graham Smith, Junior,

to Edward Thomas Black

If both sets of parents are paying or you want to acknowledge them equally regardless of financial contribution (more popular in this day and age than you can even imagine), you would add the line after the second groom’s name “son of Dr. and Mrs. Leroy Desmond Black.”  Yes, I am making the names up (I knew you were wondering).

2 – Who sits on which side at the wedding? 

Traditionally, the bride’s family goes on the left and the groom’s family sits on the right.  But at a gay wedding where there are two brides or two grooms, it’s less clear.  Joke all you like, but one half of each couple has always planned more of the wedding.  That’s the person we put on the bride’s side if there’s a question about it.  It’s certainly not a hard and fast rule, and you can do whatever you want, but if you need to ask me… I’ll tell you which one of you is the bride. J

3 – How do you seat the parents?  Who gets treated like top dog? 

Usually it’s the bride’s mother, but when you have two MoGs instead of a MoB, what’s the protocol?  Well, if you decided to follow my first suggestion of putting whoever planned the wedding on the left side, you would seat the mother of the person on the right first, and then follow with the MoG who will be seated on the left (the traditional MoB spot).

4 – Should you do the first dance and cut the cake?

You should do whatever you want to do on your wedding day.  If you’ve always wanted to smash your partner’s face with cake, why hold back?  Yet, you don’t have to do anything you’re uncomfortable with.  I have plenty of straight clients who opt out of cake cuttings, first dances and even the bouquet toss.  You should do things that make your day more special.

5 – Who belongs on the “must invite” list?

The same people should be invited to your wedding regardless of your sexual preference.  The only people you should invite should be people who love you and support your decision to get married.  If you have some family members who don’t approve of your decision, you don’t have to invite them.  Nobody negative should be included.  Don’t try to be the bigger or better person.  It’s your wedding day.  The entire day is about the union you’ve chosen to form.  Anybody who doesn’t get that and isn’t completely behind you doesn’t belong there on such an important day.

Etiquette is more than knowing that nobody’s plate should be cleared from the table until everybody at that table is finished eating.  A lot of it is a framework to which you apply common sense.  It gets tricky, however, when the social situation under consideration is a wedding or commitment ceremony because there are such a heightened level of emotions involved.  Sometimes you have to stop, take a breath, and mentally step back from a situation to make the proper wediquette decision.  Ask yourself what would EP (Emily Post) do?

Until next time, happy wedding planning from Weddings in Vieques and Weddings in Culebra?   Have you started planning your Caribbean destination wedding or commitment ceremony yet?

Sandy

www.weddingsinvieques.com

Sandy Malone, a guest blogger with Purple Unions, is the owner of Weddings in Vieques, a full-service destination wedding planning company based on Vieques Island, seven miles off the coast of Puerto Rico.  She and her team (including her husband Bill, a retired SWAT team commander) have planned and executed almost 400 weddings and commitment ceremonies in the Spanish Virgin Islands.  Sandy is a veteran event planner from Washington, DC, with years of experience planning large and small weddings, press conference, and corporate and political events.  She has planned countless events on Vieques Island, beginning with her own wedding back in 2004.  Since that time, her professional staff has executed large and small weddings of all styles, including elopements, vow renewals and fabulously posh events at multi-million dollar waterfront villas.  She has also planned family reunions, destination baby showers, corporate retreats and a variety of other events for clients from all over the United States and Canada.  Sandy is also the owner of Weddings in Culebra (wedding planning on Vieques’ little sister island) and Flowers in Vieques (a full service floral and décor firm).  Visit her at www.weddingsinvieques.com.

NJ: Dissolving a Civil Union Takes Longer, Costs More Than Divorce

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

For same-sex couples unhappy in their civil unions, breaking up is hard to do. For starters, ending a civil union is called “dissolution,” not “divorce,” and legal experts say the difference between those two words has created confusion over which laws and cases apply to civil unions.

“You end up with one set of rules for one thing and another set of rules for another thing,” said Stephen Hyland, 56, a family practice lawyer in Cherry Hill who represents gay clients.

Lawyers familiar with the issue also say it’s harder to divvy up assets or assign alimony because there’s virtually no case precedent for ending civil unions and divorce precedents are not always applied to dissolutions. Sorting out the unions then can take longer and cost clients more than it would if they were ending a traditional marriage.

Full Story from NJ.com: http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/12/nj_gay_couples_looking_for_a_c.html

Click here for gay marriage resources in New Jersey.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Australia: Gay Couple First to Be Legally Recognized, But for How Long?

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Warren McGaw and Chris Rumble have become the first Australian gay couple to have their civil partnership ceremony legally recognised. The pair, who have been together for nearly 20 years, held their ceremony yesterday afternoon at the Old Parliament House rose gardens in Canberra.

They are the first to take advantage of new legislation passed in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) earlier this month. However, the right may not last for long as prime minister Kevin Rudd has said he will overturn the law.

MacGaw told ABC News: “We thought we’d take this opportunity not only for gay couples Australia-wide … but just for human rights. I think the majority of Australians are behind us.”

Full Story from Pink News: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/11/25/gay-couple-have-australias-first-civil-union/

Planning to marry your partner? Click here for gay marriage resources in Australia.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.