gay marriage laws

...now browsing by category

 

North Carolina Newspapers Do Not Support Marriage Amendment

Thursday, September 8th, 2011

By Melanie Nathan, Publisher of GAY U.S. A. the Movie and Blog

Photo: Kristina Lapinski of GAY U.S.A. the Movie

As North Carolina legislators gear up to vote on a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, editorial boards at newspapers throughout the state have come out against the vote and the amendment. Some papers cite it as a distraction from job creation, while others have called it an effort enshrine discrimination in the state constitution.

The American Independent searched for newspaper editorials supporting the proposed amendment, but identified none as of Wednesday afternoon.

The Lexington Dispatch argued that amending the constitution was a hasty idea:

Legislators need to use restraint when amending the state constitution. Only the most serious issues should be sent to the voters for their say-so. If passing a law will accomplish the same goal, then that’s the better path to take. Even on the no felons as sheriff’s amendment, some opponents argued that didn’t merit a change in the constitution. Similar concerns can be voiced over the gay marriage amendment. The state constitution already defines marriage as between a man and a woman. A law passed in 1996 doesn’t acknowledge same-sex marriages in North Carolina that occur in other states that allow it.

The Raleigh News Observer warned Democrats not to side with Republicans in voting for the amendment:

Just as clearly, hostility to gay marriage – and to gays – would be cemented in the constitution, a document better suited to expanding rights than to constricting them. It’s likely that in coming years such an amendment will seem as illogical, discriminatory and downright unfair as states’ former laws that outlawed interracial marriages.

The Wilmington Star News said job creation should be a top priority of legislators, not banning same-sex marriage.

The Greenville Daily Reflector said that with clean up from Hurricane Irene still underway, now is not the time for an amendment vote.

The Charlotte Observer called the amendment a roadblock that would harm business in the state:

Winston-Salem Journal called the push for an amendment by Republicans and some Democrats “useless”:

The Shelby Star wrote that government should get out of the marriage business.

See Full quotes and Article can be read in full at The American Independent:

Analyses of Four States Reviewing their Anti Gay Marriage Laws

Friday, November 20th, 2009

The marriage equality drumbeat has rumbled on with news that several states will be attempting to re-examine their state constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage and/or civil unions. Surprisingly, this hasn’t received as much attention as I assumed it would in the LGBT blogosphere.

Ohio state representative Tyrone K. Yates (D-Cincinnati), Kentucky state representative Mary Lou Marzian (D-Jefferson), and Michigan House Speaker Pro Tem Pam Byrnes (D-Washtenaw County) have all introduced legislation to repeal their state’s respective marriage amendments.

Texas Attorney General candidate Barbara Radnofsky, however, has discovered that the state’s amendment also inadvertently “eliminates marriage in Texas,” including common-law marriages. A Texas judge ruled the state’s amendment was unconstitutional last month.

Full Story from The Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bil-browning/good-news-or-bad-ideas-ky_b_364738.html

Planning to marry your partner? Click here for gay marriage resources.


To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.