amendment

...now browsing by tag

 
 

OH, USA: Local Views on Proposed Marriage Equality Amendment

Tuesday, April 10th, 2012

OH, Marriage Equality Amendment ViewsVoters in the November 2013 election could decide if Ohio will become the 10th state to allow same-sex marriages if proponents of a petition to amend the state constitution can gather the necessary signatures to place it on the ballot.

New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Iowa, Vermont and New Hampshire currently allow same-sex marriages as does Washington D.C. while California, Maryland and Washington have statutory or judicial recognition of same-sex marriage that has not yet taken effect.

On April 3, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine certified a petition from the Ohio Freedom to Marry Coalition that seeks to repeal and replace Section 11, Article XV of the Ohio Constitution.

Full Story from the Marietta Times

Click here for gay wedding resources in Ohio.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

MN, USA: President Obama’s Campaign Goes On Record Against Anti Marriage Equality Amendment

Tuesday, April 10th, 2012

President Obama on MN Anti Marriage Equality AmendmentPresident Barack Obama’s campaign on Monday issued a statement in opposition to a proposed constitutional amendment which would define marriage as a heterosexual union in Minnesota.

“While the President does not weigh in on every single ballot measure in every state, the record is clear that the President has long opposed divisive and discriminatory efforts to deny rights and benefits to same sex couples,” Kristen Sosanie, spokeswoman for the Obama for America – Minnesota campaign, said in a statement.

“That’s what the Minnesota ballot initiative would do – it would single out and discriminate against committed gay and lesbian couples – and that’s why the President does not support it.”

Full Story from On Top Magazine

Click here for gay wedding resources in Minnesota.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

OH, USA: Amendment to Repeal Marriage Equality Ban Moves Ahead

Wednesday, April 4th, 2012

Ohio Gay Marriage Ban RepealMarriage equality advocates in Ohio took one step closer Tuesday to overturning the state’s 2004 constitutional amendment that restricts marriages in the state to only those between one man and one woman.

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine (R) approved the petition language for an amendment that would redefine marriage in Ohio as “a union of two consenting adults, regardless of gender,” according to the Columbus Dispatch.

The Freedom to Marry Coalition is now tasked with gathering 385,253 valid signatures of registered Ohio voters in order to put its marriage equality amendment on the Ohio ballot — a goal that Ian James, the group’s co-founder, told The Huffington Post he hopes to achieve by November 2013.

Full Story from the Huffington Post

Click here for gay wedding resources in Ohio.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

WA: Two Competing Measures In the Works to Repeal Marriage Equality Law

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

Washington State Marriage Equality RepealOpponents of Washington state’s new gay marriage law want voters to select “no” on the November 2012 ballot. And also “yes.” That seeming paradox stems in competing efforts launched this week by two groups dedicated to the cause of keeping Washington from joining six other states and the District of Columbia from legalizing same-sex matrimony.

They have until June 6 to gather the 120,577 valid signatures needed to secure a spot on the 2012 ballot. If the referendum qualifies, the gay marriage statute — already on hold until June 7 under the standard waiting period for new laws — would be kept from taking effect before the election. A majority of “no” votes on the referendum question in November would strip the new law from the books altogether.

But Thursday morning, a different repeal coalition, Protect Marriage Washington 2012, plans to start collecting signatures for Initiative 1192, asking voters to say “yes” to a measure that would define marriage as between one man and one woman. In contrast to a statewide referendum, initiatives have until July 6 to obtain 241,154 signatures, and only the referendum can delay the gay marriage law from taking effect before the election.

Full Story from GayToday

Click here for gay travel resources in Washington State.

 

US: How Likely is a Constitutional Ban on Same Sex Marriage?

Monday, January 9th, 2012

CongressLast week’s Iowa Republican Caucus produced what effectively amounted to a tie. Mitt Romney came in first place with 30,015 votes, while Rick Santorum came in second, just eight votes behind him on 30,007. Both Republicans are on record as saying they favour amending the United States Constitution to define marriage as solely a union between a man and woman. In other words, both want to overrule Washington D.C. and the six states that currently allow same-sex marriage by banning it at the federal level.

It is, of course, laughable that candidates who claim to advocate “small government” and “less regulation” want to intrude on the private lives of American citizens and regulate whom they can and can’t marry. It is, of course, hypocritical that they paint themselves at patriots with the same values as America’s Founding Fathers and then seek to amend the Constitution that those founders painstakingly debated and wrote. I could write about either of these issues, but what interests me more is whether or not such a constitutional amendment is even possible.

Since the Constitution was ratified in June 1788, there have been 27 successful amendments. Ten of these are included in the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791. Counting the Bill of Rights as a single amendment rather than 10 separate ones means there have only ever been 18 successful amendment movements in the last 223 years. These have included protecting freedom of speech (I), the right to bear arms (II), the right to trial by jury (VII), the abolition of slavery (XIII), and the granting to women of the right to vote (XIX). Only one amendment has ever restricted individuals’ rights: that amendment introduced prohibition (XVIII) and was ratified in 1919, but it was repealed 14 years later by a further amendment (XXI).

Full Story from the Huffington Post

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Equality North Carolina Prepares for Amendment Fight

Sunday, November 13th, 2011

North Carolina Gay Marriage FightEquality North Carolina has gathered together some four hundred LGBTA activists from across their state on Saturday for a day-long conference on LGBT education, advocacy and organization. They are doing this ahead of the campaign to put marriage inequality into their constitution. The group’s leaders have been addressing the amendment while at the conference, seeing as how it is one of the most important issues on the minds of most attendees.

According to Qnotes: Former Interim Executive Director Alex Miller and newly-hired Executive Director Stuart Campbell opened the conference with their annual State of Equality address. Miller ran down the group’s lobbying efforts on the amendment, which ultimately gained approval on Sept. 13.

Miller told the audience that North Carolinians will vote against the amendment when they are told the true harms and intents that are behind it. He also stated “When they picked this fight, they didn’t just pick it with us. They picked it with a lot of folks.”

Full Story from Lez Get Real

Click here for gay wedding resources in North Carolina.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Equality North Carolina Tells The Truth About Proposed Amendment

Monday, September 5th, 2011

North Carolina Gay Marriage BanStatewide advocacy group Equality North Carolina has released a publication that outlines their arguments in opposition to a proposed anti-LGBT constitutional amendment that would ban marriage and other relationship recognition for same-sex couples.

The booklet is entitled “The Truth About the Discriminatory, Job-Killing, Harmful, Family-Unfriendly, Divisive, Anti-LGBT Marriage Amendment.” It’s already been emailed to every member of the General Assembly and Staffers with Equality North Carolina say they’ll hand-deliver hard copies this week. The booklet has also been distributed to statewide media.

The publication outlines several negative implications of the proposed amendment, including negative business impacts on private businesses’ ability to offer domestic partner benefits to employees; legal complications for same-sex couples and unmarried couples, including hospital visition, end-of-life decisions and life insurance policies; and a negative impact on the enforcement of domestic violence laws.

Full Story from QNotes

Click here for gay wedding resources in North Carolina.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

NC: Battle Lines Drawn Over Anti Gay Marriage Amendment

Sunday, August 28th, 2011

North Carolina Gay Marriage BanAnyone visiting Bob Page’s office on the second floor of Replacements Ltd.’s sprawling Knox Road complex will likely focus on one of two features: pictures of his adopted 12-year-old twin boys perched on the edge of his desk or a large window looking down on the china-laden showroom.

Truth be told, Page probably would be happier talking about the company he founded or his boys’ achievements rather than a proposed amendment to add a ban on gay marriage to North Carolina’s constitution.

But the Rockingham County native, a PAC formed by his company’s employees and some members of his staff are working against the measure, which lawmakers may consider during a session that begins Sept. 12.

Full Story from the News-Record

Click here for gay wedding resources in North Carolina.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

NC: Lawmakers to Debate Anti Marriage Equality Amendment on September 12th

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

North Carolina Gay Marriage BanNorth Carolina lawmakers will return to Raleigh on September 12 to begin debate on a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage.

The special session on constitutional amendments will consider whether to send three issues to the ballot box in 2012. Among them is a proposal to define marriage as a heterosexual union.

The legislation was introduced in the Senate in February and in the House in April.

Full Story from On Top Magazine

Click here for gay wedding resources in North Carolina.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

MN: HRC Starts PAC to Fight Amti Gay Marriage Amendment

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011

The Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBT advocacy group, registered a political action committee (PAC) with the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board on Monday with the purpose of defeating a ballot measure that would place a ban on same-sex marriage in the Minnesota Constitution. The PAC joins three others working to defeat the amendment. Currently, only one ballot campaign is working to pass the amendment.

HRC’s campaign, the Minnesota Family Freedom PAC, is the first national group to take an interest in defeating the amendment in Minnesota. Active on the opposite side is Minnesota for Marriage, a campaign comprised of the Minnesota Family Council and the Minnesota Catholic Conference, as well as the National Organization for Marriage. NOM has been active in the state since 2010 when it ran ads in support of Republicans.

NOM ran the ads in concert with the Minnesota Family Council as opposed to the Minnesota for Marriage ballot campaign, a move that sparked a campaign finance complaint earlier this year. That complaint is still pending.

Full Story from MN Independent

Click here for gay wedding resources in Minnesota.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.