amicus brief

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Marriage Equality Foe Solicits Donations for Amicus Brief to Supreme Court

Friday, February 10th, 2012

Just got this from Eugene Delguadio, self styled “Public Advocate of the United States”:

“Should Californians be forced to accept homosexual “marriage” in their state, even though they voted overwhelmingly to preserve real marriage? The U.S. Supreme Court is about to decide the issue, and I need your immediate help. God’s values: FREEDOM, DECENCY and FAITH are on trial. And if you will stand with me, Public Advocate will stand for their defense.”

Now for the money pitch:

“That’s why I hope you will join me in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold state marriage laws by contributing today to help fund my Amicus brief. Your generous contribution of $250, $100, $75, $50 or $25 will go directly to paying for this crucial legal document. I have calculated that I need to raise $25,000 to pay for this fight. Maybe even more…”

And the clincher:

“Remember, if everyone gave just $25 we would reach our goal in a single day, and then some! And I will use every additional dollar that comes in to spread the word to more pro-family Americans and ask them to stand against this perversion of marriage and the radical Homosexual Lobby. Whatever you can afford, time is short, please don’t hesitate a day. Together you and I can beat back the Homosexual Lobby one more time.”

As a proud member of the radical Homosexual Lobby (gee, where’s my membership card?) it’s good to see our opponents begging for money to continue their bigotry. In a strange way, it gives me hope.

What is an Amicus Brief?

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

In separate cases over the last few weeks, various parties have filed what laywers call amicus curiae briefs arguing that Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) are unconstitutional.

Amicus briefs are “friend of the court” submissions where individuals or groups with an interest in ongoing litigation but are not parties to that litigation let the court know their views. So, the Chamber of Commerce often files amicus briefs in business cases; the ACLU often submits amicus briefs in civil rights cases. Lambda Legal has had great success filing amicus briefs in gay rights cases and having their submissions quoted in final decisions.

The amicus brief recognizes that there are other people out there who will be impacted by the result in a given case, and these parties may have a unique perspective on the legal issues involved. It understands that a court’s job is to search for truth, an endeavor that can usually benefit from more than merely the two perspective of adverse parties and an endeavor that is rarely possible in the political arena.

Full Story from Towleroad.com

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Google, Microsoft, Starbucks Oppose DOMA

Friday, November 4th, 2011

StarbucksGoogle, Starbucks and Microsoft are among the 70 companies that have filed an amicus brief opposing the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA), the 1996 law that bars federal agencies and the military from recognizing the legal marriages of gay and lesbian couples.

In their filing in support of a legal challenge to the law, the companies argued that the law forces them to treat their employees differently.

“Because marriages are celebrated and recognized under state law, a federal law withholding marital benefits from some lawful marriages, but not others, creates a non-uniform rule. Employers are obliged to treat one employee spouse differently from another, when each is married, and each marriage is equally lawful,” the companies said in their brief.

Full Story from On Top Magazine

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

US: 133 House Members File Brief in Support of DOMA Repeal

Friday, November 4th, 2011

Defense of Marriage ActA coalition of equality fighters comprised of 133 U.S. House members filed an Amicus brief blasting the Defense of Marriage Act and calling for its immediate repeal on Thursday. Details follow.

Some of the 133 names on the Amicus Brief on DOMA includes such heralded LGBT allies as Jerrold Nadler, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Tammy Baldwin, and James Clyburn, among others.

Full Story from Instinct

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Gay Groups File Amicus Brief in Prop 8 Case

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

Prop 8Groups Argue that Proposition 8 Sponsors Do Not Speak for the State. The National Center for Lesbian Rights, Equality California, and Lambda Legal filed a friend-of-the court brief with the California Supreme Court arguing that the proponents of Proposition 8 have no power to override the decision of elected state officials about whether to appeal a federal court decision that Prop 8 is unconstitutional.

The brief explains that initiative proponents are unelected and have no right to act as representatives of the state. It also explains that regardless of how the California Supreme Court rules, the supporters of Proposition 8 have no “standing” to pursue an appeal in federal court because they are not harmed by allowing same-sex couples to marry and because their interests were limited to having the measure put to a vote.

“California law does not permit the unelected proponents of a constitutional initiative to step into the state’s shoes when elected officials appropriately decide not to appeal a decision striking down an unconstitutional measure,” said Equality California Interim Executive Director Jim Carroll. “We are hopeful that the appeal will soon be dismissed, restoring marriage equality as soon as possible, and that same-sex couples and their families will once again be able to enjoy equality and dignity under the law.”

Full Story from Lez Get Real

Click here for gay marriage resources in California.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

MA: FRC Files Amicus Brief, Too

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011

FRC's Tony PerkinsFirst it was the National Organization for (Heterosexual, Cis-Gender) Marriage, and now it is the Family Research Council filing amici on behalf of the Defense of Marriage Act, and using the same kind of bogus arguments which are their stock in trade as an SPLC recognized hate group. The courts have ruled that DOMA, or part of it, is unconstitutional because of a combination of the 10th and 14th Amendments.

The FRC through their pet legal group the Thomas More Society and their lawyer Paul Linton, has offered up this legal rationalization for why DOMA should be kept in place:

1. There is no Federal Constitutional Right to enter into a same-sex marriages.

Full Story from Lez Get Real

Click here for gay marriage resources in Massachusetts.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

CA: “Family” Groups File Brief in Prop 8 Case

Saturday, September 25th, 2010

As if we needed more confirmation that the anti-equality crowd is bereft of logical arguments and grasping at straws, a group of about 30 of Family Research Council’s state affiliates, called Family Policy Councils, have filed an amicus brief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger Proposition 8 case. They’re asking the Court to overturn Judge Vaughn Walker’s well-reasoned ruling that Prop 8, which stripped gay and lesbian couples of their right to marry in California, is unconstitutional. You know that the amicus brief is a terrifically embarrassing document when a non-lawyer like me can look into it and see whole schools of red herring. Here are just a few of the keepers. From the very first sentence of the Summary of the Argument section on page 2:

“The United States’ government consists of checks and balances designed to limit the power of the various parts of the government, ensuring it follows the will of the people.”

Our federal government, as set out in the U.S. Constitution, uses the separation of powers principle to enforce power sharing among the three co-equal branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial). The purpose of this system of checks and balances is to prevent any one branch of government from gaining too much power, not to the protect “the will of the people”.

Full Story from Pam’s House Blend

Click here for gay marriage resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

First Prop 8 Amicus Brief Brings Up Judge Walker’s Orientation

Friday, September 17th, 2010

Before gay marriage foes filed their first brief to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to restore Proposition 8, both parties agreed to open up the matter to amicus curiae briefs. Who would have the first say? A guy named Robert Wooten, who wastes no time in making things personal, at least for Northern District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker, who in August delivered the landmark ruling calling Prop 8 unconstitutional.

“If the allegation that Judge Walker is a homosexual is true, [then] he has a personal interest in the outcome of the trial” and should have recused himself, the brief states.

And with that, the speculation over Walker’s sexual orientation is now apparently for the first time part of the court record. Walker has not discussed his orientation publicly. And for the duration of the Prop 8 trial, the parties had stayed away from the topic — at least inside the courtroom.

Full Story from Law.com

Click here for gay marriage resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

NJ: Garden State Equality Files Brief With State Supreme Court

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Today, Garden State Equality, along with five children’s and family organizations, filed an amicus brief with the New Jersey Supreme Court. The brief contends that denying marriage to same-sex couples inflicts psychological harm on children being raised by same-sex couples as well as on gay and lesbian youth. The brief was filed in support of the motion filed by Lambda Legal in March asking the New Jersey Supreme Court to grant same-sex couples the right to marry.

NJ’s unequal marriage law hurts children of same-sex couples, as well as gay and lesbian youth

The brief says that testimony collected by New Jersey’s Senate Judiciary Committee, New Jersey’s Civil Union Review Commission, and social science literature support the claim that New Jersey’s separate and unequal civil union law is harming New Jersey’s children by denying same-sex parents the right to marry. The brief also argues that lesbian and gay youth are harmed by New Jersey’s discriminatory marriage law by sending the message that they are not equal to their straight peers and that their relationships can never be granted the legal status that opposite-sex couples can obtain.

Full Story from Examiner.com

Click here for gay marriage resources in New Jersey.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.