decision

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Colombia Gay Rights Groups to Protest Court Decision

Friday, November 12th, 2010

Gay rights advocates in Colombia planned to protest Friday after the nation’s highest court rejected a lawsuit that could have legalized gay marriage.

Protesters are planning to gather in the central square of Bogota, the nation’s capital, Friday, said Yeiler Manuel Tapia Barrios, an activist from the coastal town of Baranquilla.

“We feel that they are violating our rights as citizens. We also pay the same taxes,” said Tapia, 24.

Full Story from CNN

Click here for gay marriage resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

IA: Judges Defend Gay Marriage Ruling

Wednesday, October 20th, 2010

Iowa Gay MarriageTwo Iowa Supreme Court judges defended their ruling in a same-sex marriage case and say opponents are wrong to claim the court was obligated to refer the issue to the state Legislature.

Chief Justice Marsha Ternus and Justice David Baker on Wednesday told the editorial board at The Gazette in Cedar Rapids that opponents misinterpret the Iowa Constitution when they argue the court was wrong in 2009 when it struck down a state law that banned marriage by same-sex couples. Some opponents contend the court was obligated to send the matter back to the Legislature.

Baker says the court would have overstepped its role if it told another branch of government to take up the issue.

Full Story from WQAD

Click here for gay marriage resources in Iowa.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

IA: Gay Marriage Opponents Try to Punish Supreme Court Judges

Monday, September 13th, 2010

Marsha Ternus, the chief justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, is unopposed in her bid for reelection this November. It will probably be the toughest campaign of her life.Ternus, along with two of her colleagues on the court, find themselves in a situation rarely encountered by appointed judges in the United States. They are the targets of an organized effort to turn a judicial retention election – a simple “yes” or “no” vote on whether an initially appointed judge should remain on the bench – into a political battle. The election is drawing national money and attention, and already has more in common with a contested race for governor or attorney general than it does with the ordinarily mundane process of voting on a sitting judge’s record, with no other names on the ballot.

The unusual effort is the brainchild of Bob Vander Plaats, a well-known figure in Iowa politics who waged a strong campaign in the state’s Republican gubernatorial primary in June. Vander Plaats, a social conservative, now is trying to persuade a majority of Iowans to vote “no” on the retention of Ternus and justices David Baker and Michael Streit as a way to punish them for their role in a 7-0 Supreme Court ruling last year that legalized same-sex marriage in Iowa.

Ternus, Baker and Streit are the only members of the court who face a retention vote this year, and ousting them would trigger a process in which the governor – currently Democrat Chet Culver – would name three replacements. It would have no impact on the gay-marriage ruling itself.

Full Story from State Bill News

Click here for gay marriage resources in Iowa.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

CA: Courage Campaign Says Prop 8 Decision Likely Due Before Whitman Could Become Governor

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

The gay rights group Courage Campaign played down Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman’s announcement yesterday that she would defend Proposition 8, which prohibits same-sex marriage, if elected governor.

Courage Campaign director Rick Jacobs noted that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has already scheduled a hearing for the week of Dec. 6 to determine whether the initiative’s sponsor, the advocacy group Protect Marriage, has legal standing to defend the voter-passed measure.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown have declined to join the list of defendants in the case. Chief Judge Vaughn Walker of the Northern District of California, who declared the proposition unconstitutional Aug. 4, had suggested that only the state could defend the law.

Full Story from the Fresno Bee

Click here for gay marriage resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Gay Wedding Directories Wait for Prop 8 Resolution

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

Gay Wedding DirectoriesAmong all the furor over the Federal case against Proposition 8 in California, there have been a few stories about how wedding vendors have been affected, and what might happen if and when Prop 8 is finally done away with.

There are also several online wedding directories out there who are eager for the resolution of this case, not just because of the bottom line, but because they truly desire to see the cause of marriage equality advance for themselves, their friends and family, and their community.

We’ll cover a couple here – Kathryn Hamm at GayWeddings.com and our own PurpleUnions.com:

How did your site get started?

GayWeddings: My straight mom founded our business back in 1999 when she couldn’t find any products for my wedding to my partner. She had assumed that “everything had already been invented” and was stunned when she went to her local gay bookstore (in Dallas) and the clerk said that not only did they not have any gay wedding albums, but they hadn’t ever heard of a product like that for two brides or two grooms. This inspired her to open our pioneering boutiques: TwoBrides.com & TwoGrooms.com. In 2005, we acquired GayWeddings.com and this allowed us to expand our offerings to include more planning resources, a forum, a gay-friendly
directory, our blog, and, of course, our boutique.

PurpleUnions: We started our travel directory, PurpleRoofs.com, in 1997, when we realized that there were few good, comprehensive, up-to-date travel resources online for the LGBT community. A number of our innkeepers also hosted weddings, and so in July of 2003, we created PurpleUnions.com – it seemed like a natural outgrowth of what we were already doing, and it was also something that we cared about passionately and personally.

How did you guys become involved in the marriage equality movement?

GayWeddings: In a sense, my family has been involved ever since my partner and I declared in 1995 that we wanted to have a ceremony and as we have learned (in some cases the hard way) about the rights and benefits which we, as an unmarried couple, cannot access. And, certainly, as my mom launched the business, our business vision to educate others about this underserved market and the need for partnership rights and marriage equality rights. In fact, my mom has even lobbied on the Hill and tells a classic story of meeting with a conservative Congressman from Texas (her home state) and telling him that he should change his policy because marriage equality “isn’t a matter of if; it’s a matter of when!”

Purple Unions: It’s been a long evolution. Scott attended his first commitment ceremony around 1989, when a friend and his partner exchanged rings and vows in a private, informal ceremony in the bamboo forest at the Huntington Gardens. I remember how secretive it was – we found a private spot, and the rest of us (three friends) hovered protectively around the lucky couple to keep out the rest of the world. When the two of us met, in 1992, the idea of marriage equality still seemed like a far-off fantasy. But shortly thereafter, Clinton was elected, and it seemed like a new day had dawned. We all know how that went. But the fires were rekindled in 2004, when Gavin Newsom stood up for us and asked why we shouldn’t be allowed to marry like everyone else. We started a new section of the site – 7,000 Strong (referring to the approximate number of gay and lesbian couples known to be married at that time) – tp tell the stories of our lives. We were married on March 11th, 2004, in San Francisco’s City Hall, a magical moment for us and our relationship. And when our marriage was subsequently struck down by the state Supreme Court later that year, two marriage equality activists were born.

What does the site have to offer (features, etc)?

GayWeddings: Our site offers a wide range of planning resources and specialty products. Couples can enjoy free Wed Pages to announce their engagements/weddings; can participate in forum discussions; can access planning articles, tips & news alerts; and, can locate gay-friendly vendors in our directory. We also offer consultation services (via phone or in person for those couples in the Metro DC area). Our boutique, as always, has offered a wide-range of products including invitations, cake tops, wedding albums and guestbooks, rings, specialty gifts, and more.

PurpleUnions: Our main focus is our vendor directory. We list more than 1,000 wedding vendors – photographers, officiants, planners, florists, wedding venues and much more – in more than twenty countries/regions around the world, and we’re constantly adding more. We also have a gay marriage blog, with news from around the world every day about same sex marriage, civil unions, LGBT rights, and anything else we can find related to the fight for marriage Equality.

What are you doing to help further marriage equality?

GayWeddings: Everything that we do furthers marriage equality. I’ve always said that gay and lesbian weddings are transformative. One cannot help but be transformed when witnessing the love and commitment exchanged by a couple during a ceremony. And, once folks understand what same sex relationships are all about, it becomes more difficult for them to vote against legislation which supports marriage equality. In a sense, as Gloria Steinham has said, the personal is political, and this is very true for the GLBT community. Once people know us and understand who we are, we are no longer a nameless, faceless wedge issue. Additionally, we work hard to educate vendors and manufacturers about the same sex wedding market. We have spent many years lobbying and educating suppliers in order to bring more gay-friendly products to market and we have countless conversations with vendors about shaping the ‘face’ of their business to be more inclusive — for ALL brides & grooms. Finally, whenever possible, we lobby legislators and friends & family to help them better understand marriage equality and why these rights matter for us.

PurpleUnions: Just the existence of directories like ours helps further the cause of marriage equality – they make people reconsider their long-held beliefs about what marriage is and what marriage should be. But in addition, we run this blog which allows us to both keep on top of and to share everything going on around the world on this issue – a clearinghouse for the day’s news about gay marriage. Every day, we post summaries and links for 8-10 stories about marriage equality – we’re following developments at the moment in Mexico, California, Michigan, Wisconsin, the UK, Latin America, and a number of other places. We also research and maintain an event calendar that shows, at any given time, between 50 and 150 upcoming rallies, meetings, wedding expos, phonebanks, and other events related to marriage equality. Our blog is accessible via Google News, Facebook, and Twitter, and we’re working on new partnerships to help get the word out. Marriage Equality is a fight our community needs to win.

For more information about these directories, visit GayWeddings.com and PurpleUnions.com

Michael Medved: Prop 8 Wasn’t a Ban; Straights Aren’t Better, Just More Good, And Black is the Same as White

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Conservative radio host Michael Medved wants to cleat up a few “gay marriage myths“. We’ll look at a couple here:

The ubiquitous headlines describing this voter-mandated change in the California Constitution as a “gay marriage ban” amount to an egregious example of journalistic malpractice. The entire proposition consisted of only 14 words: “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” This simple statement imposes no restrictions and issues no commands regarding the behavior of private citizens; it merely demands a change in the actions of government.

Yes, and before Prop 8 gay men could marry gay men, and lesbians could marry lesbians. After Prop 8, they could not. So how is this not a ban? Fail.

It didn’t discriminate among individuals; it drew distinctions among relationships. Under the proposition, a gay male and a straight male would face exactly the same options in marriage; there is no relationship open to the straight citizen that’s denied to his gay neighbor.

Ah yes, this old chestnut. Gays and lesbians aren’t discriminated against – any gay man can marry any woman he wants. I’m sure this is great comfort to all those gay men and lesbians who are just itchin’ to leave their partners for a little
heterosexual loving. Just like all the straight folks are just waiting for the chance to get a little same sex lovin’. Fail.

Opposition to government sanction of gay marriages isn’t based on the notion that opposite-sex couples are “better,” but on the idea that they are more consequential and serve an important social purpose more effectively.

Um, ok. Some basic English here. How, in Medvedland, is it that “more consequential” and “serve an important social purpose more effectively” does not equal better? Just come out and say it, Mister Medved – you think straight couples are better than gay and lesbian couples. Fail.

Actually, opposition to gay marriage involves the defense of privacy from governmental intrusion, not any sort of intimate assault. The drive to mandate gay marriage demands a vast expansion of governmental involvement into same-sex relationships.

So once again, just like when they didn’t want to allow us to get married while the prop 8 campaign was underway for our own good, to keep gay and lesbian couples from being hurt, it’s now for our own good, to keep the government out of the lives of gay and lesbian people, that Medved and his ilk want to keep us from getting married? Lovely. But no thanks. Fail.

It’s amazing to me how, after such a careful dissection of all the lies and propaganda by Judge Walker, someone like Medved can just start up the ole’ spin machine again and spew it all out brand-new.

So let me say this again, as clearly as I can. My partner and I want to get married because we love each other. We want the same rights and responsibilities that other couples have when they make a sacred commitment to each other. We don’t want your churches, your kids, or even your endorsement. We see what a wonderful thing marriage can be, and we want to be a part of it, not to destroy it, but because our parents and friends and families are all a part of it, and it’s a good thing.

We don’t want to destroy marriage, but to strengthen it.

All we can hope is that, by our example, you will one day come to understand that.

Prop 8 Ruling: Analysis of the Decision

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Here’s what you need to know about Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision invalidating California’s Proposition 8, a referendum passed by voters that banned same-sex marriage. The decision itself will be appealed, and Walker’s reasoning could serve as the basis for argument at the appellate level – or, the appeals court could decide to argue the case a completely different way.

What matters are the facts that Walker finds. Why? As Chris Geidner notes, “[the] judge or jury who makes the findings of fact, however, is given deference because factual determinations are aided by the direct benefit of the judge or jury at trial. On appeal, Judge Walker’s findings of fact will only be disturbed if the appellate court finds any to be clearly erroneous.”

Walker, in his decision, writes that “Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gays and lesbians for denial of a marriage license.” He evaluates as credible witnesses the panel of experts who testified against Proposition 8, and finds fault with the credentials of several witnesses who testified against same-sex marriage, including David Blankenhorn, President of the Institute for American Values:

Full Story from The Atlantic

Click here for gay marriage resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook – just search for Gay Marriage Watch (you’ll see our b/w wedding pic overlooking the Ferry Building and Bay Bridge in SF). We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Prop 8 Ruling: Personal Impact on One Couple

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Two federal judges have made an important difference in my life recently. I am a lawyer, and judges’ rulings frequently have a professional effect. But this time, it’s personal.

This spring, a federal judge from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia officiated at my marriage to my partner of 13 years, Jim, under the laws of the District of Columbia, where we live. On Wednesday, Judge Vaughn Walker ruled that the Proposition 8 ballot initiative in California denying same-sex marriage violated fundamental legal rights guaranteed by law.

His ruling has given my marriage even greater meaning. The restoration of rights to others and the further recognition of the right to marry makes the enjoyment of our rights even more fulfilling.

Full Story from CNN

Prop 8 Ruling: Read the Full Decision

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Here’s the link to a full copy of the Prop 8 Decision:

http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/acrobat/2010/08/04/Prop-8-Ruling-FINAL.pdf?tsp=1

Prop 8 Ruling: To Take Effect Immediately?

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

From Joe.My.God:

Moments ago California’s Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage was OVERTURNED by Judge Vaughn Walker! This is just the beginning of a very long court battle, but for today, let’s CELEBRATE!

I’ll update this post shortly with the details of Walker’s ruling.

UPDATE: Here is the complete ruling. Feel free to grab my embed for your own sites!
Prop 8 Ruling (BIG thanks to JMG reader Victor in San Francisco for getting us the complete ruling before anybody else!)

UPDATE II: Legal eagles, does the first paragraph on the final page mean there is no stay on the ruling?