defense of marriage act

...now browsing by tag

 
 

DoJ Finally Argues Against DOMA

Monday, December 19th, 2011

DOMA Repeal and the Department of DefenseOn Friday in San Francisco, the Justice Department made its first court appearance in a lawsuit challenging the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) since President Obama’s administration first declared that the 1996 law is unconstitutional.

On Friday evening I was privileged to attend a meeting of the San Francisco BAR Association where Tony West, Assistant Attorney General for the Department of Justice’s Civil Division met with lawyers to discuss his Department’s evolution on the issue and the argument which he delivered earier the same day.

Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel Management: Karen Golinski, who is represented in the case by Lambda Legal, is herself an attorney and an employee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ninth circuit. Golinski sued the federal government in January 2010, after she was denied spousal health benefits for her wife, Amy Cunninghis.

Full Story from Gay USA

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

NJ: Former DOMA Supporter Bob Menendez Now Supports Repeal

Monday, December 19th, 2011

New Jersey Marriage EqualityNew Jersey Senator Bob Menendez on Sunday announced his support for a bill that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the 1996 law that bars federal agencies from recognizing the legal marriages of gay and lesbian couples, reversing his original vote in favor of the law.

“Since my vote in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act 15 years ago … I have reflected deeply and frequently about this issue,” Menendez wrote in an op-ed appearing Sunday in the Star-Ledger. “I have heard and listened to many different views. But for me, this comes down to an issue of fundamental fairness. For me, this comes down to the principles I learned as the child of immigrants and that I cherish as an American: that we believe in equality for all people under the law.”

“I believe the time has come to recognize the civil rights of the LGBT community. Fundamentally, I do not view this as an issue of special rights, but simply one of equal rights,” he added.

Full Story from On Top Magazine

Click here for gay wedding resources in New Jersey.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Elizabeth Warren Comes Out for Marriage Equality, DOMA Repeal

Friday, December 16th, 2011

Elizabeth Warren and DOMA RepealU.S. Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren speaks out for equality in a post at Blue Mass Group:

“As other states grapple with whether to support marriage equality, I’m ready to move to the next step: End the two-tiered system created by the Defense of Marriage Act. Our federal government should not be in the business of selecting which married couples it supports and which it treats with contempt.

“States define marriage among couples, and, once married, all those couples and their families should have the same protections, the same benefits, and the same tax treatments. Fairness and equality are foundational values in our country, and nowhere is that more important than in our families.”

Full Story from Towleroad.com

Click here for gay wedding resources in Massachusetts.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

US: Huntsman Calls DOMA “Useful”

Thursday, December 8th, 2011

Jon Huntsman on DomaRepublican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman said Thursday the Defense of Marriage Act “serves a useful purpose” in allowing states to decide the issue of marriage.

“It allows states to make their own decisions, to make their own way, and the Defense of Marriage Act, I think, is a safeguard for those states to make that decision,” Huntsman said.

Huntsman made the comments in response to a question from the Washington Blade during an event at the National Press Club in D.C., where he unveiled his “Restoring Trust” plan that he would pursue upon election to the White House.

Full Story from The Washington Blade

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

SLDN Files Request for Summary Judgment in DOMA Case

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011

SLDN DOMA LawsuitTo expedite the ruling in its case seeking equal recognition, benefits and family support for current and former servicemembers who have equally sacrificed and served in the U.S. armed forces, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN) late Tuesday filed a motion for summary judgment in its case McLaughlin v. U.S.

SLDN originally filed the case in October with co-counsel Chadbourne & Parke.

The plaintiffs, each legally married, want the armed services to recognize their families and seek the same family support and benefits for their same-sex spouses that the services and Department of Veterans Affairs provide to opposite-sex spouses.

Full Story from SDGLN

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Herman Cain Thinks He Can “Overturn the Supreme Court” on DOMA

Sunday, November 20th, 2011

Responding to a question posed by NOM’s Brian Brownshirt, tonight Herman Cain demonstrated an astounding lack of knowledge of how government works. Not one person on the panel bothered to correct him.

Full Story from Joe.My.God

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

What the DOMA Repeal Vote Really Means

Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

DOMA Repeal VoteLast week, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 10 to 8 to pass the “Respect for Marriage Act” (RFA). This legislation, introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), would repeal the so-called “Defense of Marriage Act” (DOMA), which bans federal recognition of same-sex marriages. The vote was down strict party lines, with the 10 Democrats voting for repeal of DOMA and the 8 Republicans voting to keep the discriminatory law. But what does this vote mean, and where do we go from here?

To be clear, this was a vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee. From here, the bill would, in theory, go to the full Senate for a vote. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) could add it to the agenda for debate, a move that would need to be agreed to by unanimous consent or pass on a motion to proceed. The problem comes from the fact that a motion to proceed is subject to a filibuster, which Republicans in the Senate have been using at historic levels to force a supermajority of 60 votes to move forward.

Republicans on the committee said that they did not expect the Senate to take up the bill at all, so the prospect of a filibuster if it was brought up is a certainty. The other option is for an individual senator to bring the bill up as an amendment to other legislation, although it is unclear if that will happen, as well. Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) spoke to the powerful statement that would be made by the vote alone, even if it failed this time: “If this is brought to the floor, and only the 30 co-sponsors vote for it, it is worth it.”

Full Story from the Huffington Post

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Five Reasons States Say DOMA Should Be Repealed

Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

DOMA RepealThe case against the Defense of Marriage Act is widening as more lawmakers step forward to condemn the law. The latest last week included governors and mayors, largely from states where marriage equality is recognized.

They sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee ahead of a vote on whether to repeal DOMA. The repeal advanced to the Senate on a party-line vote.

The argument against DOMA is still solidifying. For example, companies such as Google, Microsoft, and Starbucks filed a brief in a the case challenging the constitutionality of DOMA and argued that the law is just another form of government regulation that puts a burden on business, leading to wasted resources and money.

Full Story from The Advocate

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

CA: Governor Brown, Mayor Sanders Join Push for DOMA Repeal

Monday, November 14th, 2011

DOMA RepealGov. Jerry Brown and San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders have joined several other state and local leaders across the country in urging the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages by passing the Respect for Marriage Act.

The legislation, which passed a Senate committee and is headed for a vote by the full Senate, would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law that defines marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman. Six states plus Washington, D.C., grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples while California briefly allowed the practice until voters approved a gay-marriage ban in 2008.

In a letter ahead of the Senate committee vote, Sanders and 14 other political leaders voiced their support of eliminating the Defense of Marriage Act.

via SignOnSanDiego.com.

What The Senate DOMA Repeal Vote Means

Friday, November 11th, 2011

DOMA Repeal VoteThursday’s Senate Judiciary Committee vote to repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act was an important milestone.

But perhaps even more telling about how far we’ve come was what didn’t happen during the “mark-up.” Not one amendment was offered to try to gut the bill or embarrass supporters.

Freedom to Marry worked with our coalition partners and Judiciary Committee staff to prepare for a myriad of ugly amendments. Yet opposing senators told the committee they were going to offer three amendments, and only one directly related to this bill. And then yesterday morning, they chose not to even offer that.

Full Story from The Advocate

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.