history

...now browsing by tag

 
 

How We Got Here on Marriage Equality

Monday, April 8th, 2013

Gay WeddingNineteen ninety-eight was a watershed year in the battle for gay rights in America — in a bad way. Bill Clinton had in 1997 nominated James C. Hormel as ambassador to Luxembourg. But his nomination as the first openly gay U.S. ambassador stalled the following summer. Hormel, born during the early 1930s, had been a dean at the University of Chicago Law School and also a leader in creating gay institutions in his home town of San Francisco. In 1991, he endowed the Gay and Lesbian Center at the San Francisco Public Library, which would go on to bear his name when it opened.

His nomination snagged on the Republican leadership in Congress, then busily seeking President Clinton’s impeachment over his affair with Monica Lewinsky. An even bigger obstacle was their disgust over Hormel’s homosexuality.

Senator Jesse Helms, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman well known for his public opposition to the “homosexual lifestyle” and the people he called, in Newsweek in 1994, “degenerates” and “weak, morally sick wretches,” vowed to block the appointment. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi on June 15, 1998, added fuel to the fire, comparing being gay to a condition “just like alcohol…or sex addiction…or kleptomania” — a pathology in need of treatment. House Majority Leader Dick Armey chimed in to support Lott, affirming, “The Bible is very clear on this.” Assistant Senate Majority Leader Don Nickles of Oklahoma told “Fox News Sunday ” on June 21, 1998, that Hormel “has promoted a lifestyle and promoted it in a big way, in a way that is very offensive.” Against that backdrop, the comments of Republican Chuck Hagel, U.S. senator from Nebraska, didn’t stand out as idiosyncratic. Ambassadors “are representing our lifestyle, our values, our standards. And I think it is an inhibiting factor to be gay — openly aggressively gay like Mr. Hormel — to do an effective job,” Hagel, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said after meeting with Hormel, according to a July 3, 1998 Omaha-World Herald story.

Authored By Garance Franke-Ruta – See the Full Story at The Atlantic

Find more articles and gay wedding resources.

USA: Behind the Prop 8 Marriage Equality Case

Monday, April 1st, 2013

Prop 8In a new video, AFER goes behind the scenes on the Prop 8 lawsuit to bring marriage equality back to California. Towleroad.com reports:

The American Foundation for Equal Rights has released a poignant behind-the-scenes video about the days before and after the Supreme Court’s hearing on the Prop 8 case. Among those interviewed in this clip are of the several plaintiffs and their families, David Boies, Cleve Jones as well as Dustin Lance Black, who ends the video with the following quote: “We’re not done in this movement for LGBT equality. Next is, let’s get back to work and keep fighting to make sure the next generation’s lives are better than ours.”

Find more articles and gay wedding resources in California.

Marriage Equality: Standing on the Middle of History

Friday, March 29th, 2013

Gay WeddingWitnessing a historic moment is such an odd and exhilarating thing. It is hard to register the full scope of it because you are chest deep in it.

That is how I feel about the gay-marriage arguments made before the Supreme Court on Tuesday and Wednesday.

However the court rules on California’s Proposition 8 and the federal government’s Defense of Marriage Act, there is no denying that something historic has just happened: an aggrieved group has taken a stand and given voice once again to the American — and indeed Democratic — ideals of justice and fairness and freedom.

Authored By Charles M. Blow – See the Full Story at The New York Times

Find more articles and gay wedding resources.

USA: Religious Right Tries to Rewrite Stonewall History

Thursday, January 24th, 2013

Because of President Obama’s inaugural speech, the famous Stonewall Riot of 1969 has officially taken its place as one of the great moments in American history.

However, some people have taken it upon themselves to demonize what exactly happened at that bar in 1969 which helped spark the modern day gay rights movement even to the point of rewriting history.

Authored By Alvin McEwen- See the Full Story at Pam’s House Blend

Find more articles and gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

The History of Marriage Equality

Friday, September 7th, 2012

The History of Marriage EqualityOn Tuesday, the Democrats adopted a plank in their platform calling for the legalization of same-sex marriage. This came on the heels of President Barack Obama’s announcement earlier this summer that he supported same-sex marriage. While we’re still a long way from full national recognition of same-sex marriage, the event still represented a milestone in the quest for equal rights for the LGBT community.

Polling trendlines make it almost inevitable that same-sex marriage will be legalized sooner or later; generally speaking, younger voters are overwhelmingly in favor of allowing two adults to marry, and there are more younger voters every day. It’s easy to forget the long and difficult road that we’ve traveled to get to the cusp of marriage equality.

Early Activism Yields Little

In 1970, less than a year after the Stonewall Riots, gay rights activists Jack Baker and Michael McConnell applied for a marriage license in Hennepin County, the Minnesota county anchored by Minneapolis. At the time, no state laws prohibited same-sex marriage, but the license was still denied on the grounds that common law assumed marriage was between a man and a woman. The pair appealed the case to the Supreme Court, but lost.

Authored By Jeff Fecke – See the Full Story at Care2

Find more articles and gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Maine, USA: The Evolution of Marriage Equality

Friday, August 17th, 2012

Maine, USA: The Evolution of Marriage EqualityWhen I was in high school in Portland in the 1960′s, the only thing we knew about anything having to do with sex besides a boy and girl getting it on in the back seat of somebody’s Chevy was that there were “queers” , or maybe “homos”, who hung around Deering Oaks, otherwise known as ” Pickle Park”, so you shouldn’t go there alone. Oh, maybe for a baseball game, but be very careful when you go chasing after a foul ball, day or night.

Then after high school came the counter-culture and we found ourselves flocking to third floor crash pads where we sat on the floor around glass-topped lobster traps drinking Chiante wine, smoking local green, and listening to Bob Dylan tell us that “the times they are a’changin”. Society as we knew it was being upended. Long hair on males, hair everywhere on females, and, lo and behold, “gays”. People who out and out declared their sexual preference for others of their own gender, and who refused to demean themselves by haunting public places looking for cheap thrills.

Centuries of custom don’t evaporate overnight though. There was an avant-garde who declared their “gay pride” very openly, yes, but the notion that there were people who were “naturally” homosexual or lesbian and that they were not inherently immoral or deviant didn’t enter mainstream thinking until quite a bit later.

Authored By Cliff Gallant – See the Full Story at The Portland Daily Sun

Find more articles and gay wedding resources in Maine.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

New Zealand: The Marriage Equality Bill – How We Got Here

Sunday, August 5th, 2012

It’s Parliament that decides who we can and can’t marry. It’s not decided by a committee of clergy. Or handed down by Holy Writ.

The regulation of marriage in New Zealand began with an ordinance in 1842 and the first Marriage Act was passed on the establishment of Parliament in 1854.

Our present Marriage Act dates from 1955. It sets out the rules for who can and can’t marry. For example, the act prohibits a man marrying his former wife’s grandmother or his daughter’s son’s wife. It’s fortunate that Parliament thought of such possibilities and prohibited them.

Authored By Rodney Hide – See the Full Story at the NZ Herald

Find more articles and gay wedding resources in New Zealand.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

A Brief History of Prop 8

Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

Prop 8 RulingIn May 2008, the California Supreme Court ruled, in a 4-3 decision, that California’s Constitution prohibited the state from discriminating against same-sex couples in the state’s marriage laws. By mid-June, couples began marrying — although the future of same-sex marriage in the state already was headed to the November ballot.

Then, after about 18,000 same-sex couples had married in the state, on Nov. 4, 2008, the voters of the state of California elected Barack Obama president — but also voted to pass Proposition 8, which amended California’s Constitution to add, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” This created an upending of an otherwise joyous night for progressives, which was borne out by protests across the state — and country — in the weeks that followed.

With the vote, though, the marriages came to a halt. An attempt to have the initiative thrown out under state law, brought by the organizations who had supported the original lawsuit, was unsuccessful. The May 2009 ruling of the California Supreme Court upholding the amendment as valid, however, galvanized, once again, opponents of Proposition 8.

Full Story from Metro Weekly

Click here for gay wedding resources in California.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

The Real History of Marriage

Monday, October 31st, 2011

Homosexual acts between men are presently illegal in the tiny Central American nation of Belize, with punishments as harsh as ten years in prison. But according to the quite nasty alert I’ve just been forwarded, Belize’s sodomy law will be reviewed by the nation’s highest court on December 5th.

The homosexual organization UNIBAM (United Belize Advocacy Movement) and Caleb Orozco has brought a lawsuit against the Attorney General, and thus, Govt. of Belize, seeking to change Section 53 of the Criminal Code, which says: “Any person who has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any person or any animal shall be liable to 10 years imprisonment.”

Orosco & UNIBAM are seeking to remove the words “any person or” so that this law would not apply to interpersonal relationships but only that of sex with animals.

Full Story from the Huffington Post

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

History Lesson: The Passage of the Defense of Marriage Act

Friday, September 30th, 2011

Defense of Marriage Act PassageBy the time the Senate passed the Defense of Marriage Act on Sept. 10, 1996, there was no question what President Bill Clinton was going to do when the bill was presented to him.

Months earlier, May 23, 1996, Clinton made his first comments on DOMA, jumbling the specific effect of the bill but echoing comments from his press secretary that he would sign it. On July 11, 1996, the administration issued a Statement of Administration Policy: ”The President … has long opposed same sex marriage. Therefore, if H.R. 3396 were presented to the President as ordered reported from the House Judiciary Committee, the President would sign the legislation.”

But, asked if that was the only path, people around at the time — from LGBT advocates to Clinton staffers — almost universally say no. As the then-head of the Human Rights Campaign, Elizabeth Birch, says of the impact of a Clinton veto of DOMA at the time, “He could have survived it. Absolutely.”

Full Story from Metro Weekly

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.