prop 8

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Ninth Circuit Rebuffs Imperial County On Prop 8 Case… Again

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Prop 8 and Imperial CountyThe Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today again slapped the hands of Imperial County Clerk Chuck Storey and his ill-fated attempts to intervene as a defendant-appellant in the Proposition 8 case known as Perry v. Brown.

On Feb. 7, the same day the Ninth Circuit made its big ruling affirming the unconstitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, the panel rejected an attempt by Storey, representing Imperial County, to intervene in the historic case.

Today, Judges Stephen R. Reinhard, Michael Daly Hawkins and N. Randy Smith, ruled that Storey is not entitled to petition for rehearing.

Full Story from SDGLN

Click here for gay wedding resource in California.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Matt Baume: Prop 8 Rehearing Analysis

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Big news in the Prop 8 case — the Proponents have officially challenged our Ninth Circuit victory. So let’s talk about what that means for the Prop 8 case, what comes next, and when we can finally start getting married again.

Full Story from AFER

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Artist Needs Videographer for Marriage Equality Sculpture

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Prop 8 Marriage Equality SculptureJust got this from an artist who needs some assistance:

“I need some help for my Prop8 art sculpture, so thought I’d check in with you. It needs a video, so I’m trying to find someone with the skills and passion to do that. My art piece travelled around the state of California a couple of years ago, but I think a short video for youtube would be really nice.

“I don’t have those skills, but if you knows someone who does, I’d sure appreciate the help. You’ve seen my art piece, it’s 250 wooden blocks, each wrapped in a page torn from either the Bible, Book of Mormon, or YesOn8 propaganda. Each block has a quote/historical fact printed on it, and arranged in a historical fashion and I think it needs a video. You can see pics of the piece on my website….Thanks so much!”

http://scottterryprojects.com/Prop8.html

CA: The Prop 8 Case, A Primer

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Prop 8 PrimerThe proponents of Proposition 8 have filed the necessary paperwork today asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reconsider the three-judge panel’s decision on Feb. 7 in Perry v. Brown that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.

The lead attorney for the proponents of Proposition 8 told Metro Weekly earlier today that they would be filing such a motion. After the judges receiving a full briefing from the parties as to whether the matter should be reheard, all active circuit judges will vote as to whether an en banc rehearing should be held.

If a majority vote in the affirmative, the chief judge of the circuit, Alex Kozinski, and 10 other randomly selected circuit judges will hear the appeal.

Full Story from Metro Weekly

Click here for gay wedding resources in California.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

CA: Last Day for Appeal to Full 9th Circuit for Prop 8 Proponents

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

Prop 8 En-Banc ReviewTomorrow, February 21, marks a big deadline in the Prop 8 case that those of us who have been counting the days since the 9th Circuit’s decision have been eagerly anticipating: the last day that the proponents of Prop 8 can file a petition for rehearing with the 9th Circuit. The proponents have 14 days from the initial decision to do so, meaning that if they do not request an en banc review of the February 7 decision with a larger panel of the appeals court, the 3-judge panel’s ruling will be the last word at this level of appeal.

At this point, there’s no reason to speculate whether or not the proponents will actually file for a rehearing tomorrow, as they may be waiting until the last moment to do so. One question that is probably on many minds though is what happens to the stay depending on the proponents’ actions tomorrow.

In its ruling on February 7, the 9th Circuit wrote that the mandate (that is, the official notice of the decision) will not go into effect until 7 days after the deadline for a rehearing petition expires, or 7 days after a rehearing is denied. What that means is that the 9th Circuit’s stay on Judge Walker’s ruling striking down Proposition 8 will be lifted 7 days after tomorrow’s deadline (February 28), should the proponents choose not to file for rehearing. If the proponents do file for a rehearing, the stay is automatically extended until that rehearing is either denied or it is accepted and then ruled on, both of which could take some time.

Full Story from the Prop 8 Trial Tracker

Click here for gay wedding resources in California.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Did Prop 8 Decision Impact Maryland’s Marriage Equality Vote?

Saturday, February 18th, 2012

Prop 8 Decision and Civil UnionsThe debate in Maryland, where the House of Delegates approved a gay-marriage bill on Friday, made clear that the decision finding unconstitutional California’s ballot initiative banning gay marriage will have consequences nationwide–at least until the Supreme Court visits the issues.

The decision in Perry v. Brown last week by a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Proposition 8 was not considered legally consequential when it was issued. The ruling was tightly worded so that it only applied to those states where gay marriages were performed prior to being invalidated, a condition that applied only to California.

But the debate in Maryland, where Gov. Martin O’Malley has pushed the bill, which is expected to be approved by the State Senate next week, shows how Perry will shape future state legislation legalizing same-sex marriage. It means that allowing gay marriage has become the equivalent of opening Pandora’s box. Once a state has allowed just one gay or lesbian couple to marry, legally there is no going back.

Full Story from the Daily Beast

Click here for gay wedding resources in Maryland.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Will Prop 8 Ruling Prevent Some States From Offering Civil Unions?

Friday, February 17th, 2012

Prop 8 Decision and Civil UnionsOur post about the 9th Circuit Court declaring Proposition 8, California’s gay marriage ban, unconstitutional, focused on the Colorado case that spelled doom for the state’s anti-gay Amendment 2 circa the ’90s. But could this ruling cause problems for measures like the civil unions bill progressing in the Colorado Senate?

That’s one concern of Kyle Velte, a University of Denver law professor who’s studied the case. “My fear is that other states may be gun shy to give rights that are similar to marriage to gay and lesbian folks now,” she concedes. “Are statehouses going to say, ‘Should we pass civil unions that look exactly like marriage except for the word? Because under the Proposition 8 decision, we have a right to that word.’”

Velte notes that the 9th Circuit’s majority decision, written by Judge Stephen Reinhardt, “is pretty much based based on Romer v. Evans,” the Supreme Court case that overruled Amendment 2. Here’s how Reinhardt’s ruling introduces the subject:

Full Story from Westword.com

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Analysis: Why Kennedy Will Support Prop 8 Ruling

Friday, February 17th, 2012

Prop 8 Decision and Justice KennedyWith the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling last week that California’s Proposition 8 is unconstitutional, the debate on the constitutionality of marriage rights is hurtling toward the Supreme Court with increasing velocity. If and when the case reaches the Supreme Court, the decision will depend greatly on Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Following the Appeals Court ruling last week, the next step for the case is for the backers of Proposition 8 to file an appeal. They can appeal the ruling to one of two places: a larger panel of judges from the Ninth Circuit or directly to the Supreme Court of the United States. Appealing to a larger panel of the circuit court, however, is essentially just a pit stop on the way to the Supreme Court, since another Ninth Court ruling — even by a larger panel — can still be appealed to our nation’s highest court.

Once the case reaches the Supreme Court though, there is no guarantee the Justices will hear it. The Supreme Court receives thousands of requests to hear cases each year, and only chooses a small percentage of those to hear and rule on, based on which cases they think actually concern constitutional issues. For the case to be heard, four of the nine justices must vote to put the case on the Court’s calendar.

Full Story from City Watch LA

Click here for gay wedding resources in California.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

Tea Party Darling Victoria Jackson on Prop 8

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

Victoria Jackson and the Prop 8 DecisionMike Signorile caught up with former SNL star, turned far-right activist, Victoria Jackson at the recent conservative CPAC conference:

So if we allow votes like Prop 8 in California on gay marriage, does Jackson think we should we be voting on everything else, including other civil rights?

“We should vote on everything — of course we should vote on everything,” she said. But then she changed her mind: “Oh no, I believe in a republic where we should have elected officials. Democracy turns into mob-ocracy.”

Full Story from AmericaBlog

Click here for gay wedding resources.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.

DOMA and Prop 8: An Analysis

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

DOMA and Prop 8Meanwhile, at the Legion of Doom… the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is dying a slow death from a thousand cuts. The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Perry v. Brown is a great victory and a fine statement for equality, but so was Judge Tauro’s decision in Gill v. OPM, the Justice Department’s brief in Golinski v. OPM, and the Obama Administration’s refusal to defend DOMA because it fails the heightened scrutiny test the President thinks is appropriate for judging any state action that discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation.

That begs the question: Which case — Gill or Perry — would be a better vehicle for advancing the cause of gay rights at the Supreme Court? And, why?

AFTER THE JUMP, I try to think like a lawyer and a legal strategist and consider the questions up for review, the political context, and the positives and negatives of a progressive or traditionalist decision. I argue that though Gill offers the tidiest and least politically risky case for the current Supreme Court, the narrow holding in Perry opens a clear avenue for victory.

Full Story from Towleroad.com

Click here for gay wedding resources in California.

To subscribe to this blog, use the rss feed on the right, or use the form at right to join our email list. You can also email us at info@purpleunions.com. Or find us on Facebook. We’re also tweeting daily at http://www.twitter.com/gaymarriagewatc.